Let’s get one thing straight: The seminal Swiss psychoanalyst Carl Jung was not an anti-Semite–no, sorry, Carl Jung was definitely an anti-Semite. Or—wait. Which is it?
Let’s look at the facts.
One camp avows that Jung was a true-blue anti-Semite, and there’s plenty to back that up. In 1934, while in Germany, Jung published an article that included this statement: “The Aryan unconscious has a greater potential than the Jewish unconscious.” Though Jung said he maintained close friendships with German Jews throughout the 1930s, he appeared to not mind working for the Nazi-established Goring Institute of Psychology, as well as serving as president of the Nazi-dominated International General Society for Psychotherapy. “The Jew,” he once wrote, “…has never yet created a cultural form of his own and as far as we can see never will.”
Sounds pretty bad. At least until 1948, where Jung says the opposite: “I have never been a Nazi sympathizer and I never have been anti-Semitic…my friendly relations with a large group of Jewish colleagues…disproves the charge.”
Maybe. But quotes tell a different story. Regardless, there’s no consensus, and two impassioned Letters to the Editor of the New York Times espouse each view.
In the (altered) words of Jung’s friend Sigmund Freud: “Sometimes an anti-Semite is just an anti-Semite.” So: Is he or isn’t he?
Help ensure Jewish news remains accessible to all. Your donation to the Jewish Telegraphic Agency powers the trusted journalism that has connected Jewish communities worldwide for more than 100 years. With your help, JTA can continue to deliver vital news and insights. Donate today.
