Dutch aid group for Syrians accused of discriminating against job seeker with Jewish ties

A social worker applicant claimed aid workers told her to hide her work for the Jewish community so as not to upset Arab immigrants with bad memories of dispossession by Israel.

Advertisement

AMSTERDAM (JTA) — A job seeker said she was advised to hide her ties to the Jewish community during an interview with a Dutch state-funded group trying to help Syrian immigrants integrate.

Laura Vrijsen, who is not Jewish, wrote earlier this month in the Nieuw Israelietisch Weekblad weekly about her 2017 interview for Association Again at Home Rotterdam, prompting an outpouring of condemnations by politicians who accused the organization of discrimination. The association denied the allegations.

According to Vrijsen, the two women who interviewed her for a social worker’s position asked indirectly whether she was Jewish upon noticing that she had studied in Jerusalem and had worked for the JMW social services organization of the Dutch Jewish community.

Vrijsen, who was not hired due to what the association said was her relative lack of experience, called the interview an “awkward conversation.” In a column about her experience, Vrijsen said one interviewer asked, “I see that you worked for JMW and that you’ve studied in Jerusalem, what is your personal connection here?”

Vrijsen asked about the relevance of these facts to her suitability. The interviewer reportedly replied: “Well, we have Palestinian refugees, and if you go over to their house you better not mention this. Their families first had to flee Palestine and now they had to leave everything behind again, this time in Syria. This grief is deep and will never go away.”

A worker for the same outfit later told Vrijsen that if she were Jewish, the association would prefer she didn’t reveal it to clients.

“Fearing tensions, they ask Jews to hide their identity, thereby accepting anti-Semitism indirectly and even asking Jews to accept it,” Vrijsen wrote.

In Rotterdam, the municipality that funds the association with $197,000 annually, some local politicians said that Vrijsen’s account requires reform and a review of subsidies.

The local party Leefbaar Rotterdam convened a City Council debate on the issue, calling Vrijsen a victim of “blatant discrimination.” Municipal lawmakers from several parties and one in the national parliament condemned the association’s handling of the interview. A watchdog group against discrimination urged Vrijsen to lodge an official complaint against the association.

In a statement, the association said the interviewers “experienced the interview differently” than  Vrijsen described it, but did not elaborate.

“Hiding one’s identity is not an option” for the organizations, they added.

Recommended from JTA

Advertisement