Jerusalem rabbinical court seeks to end alimony ‘inflation’ in ketubah

The request to cap alimony pledges at 1 million shekels comes after an ex-wife demanded her former partner pay her 555,555 shekels that he promised but doesn't have.

Advertisement

(JTA) — Jerusalem’s regional rabbinical court asked Israel’s Chief Rabbinate to set a 1 million shekel limit on the compensation that Jewish grooms may prenuptially pledge to pay their wives in case of a divorce.

The unusual request earlier this month follows a divorce in which a man’s ex-wife demanded he pay her 555,555 shekels — approximately $145,000 — because that was the sum he pledged to pay on his ketubah, or Jewish wedding contract, the news site nrg reported Monday.

Her ex-husband argued that he made the pledge as a testament of his love and appreciation for her, not thinking it would be legally binding. But in Israel, where rabbinical and other religious tribunals act as family courts within the framework of the judiciary, ketubot are admissible as a prenuptial agreement.

Many grooms pledge sums they cannot afford, attaching many zeros to the number 18 – which is associated with life because of Jewish numerology – or the 555,555 figure, which is especially popular among Sephardic Jews who believe it is lucky. The custom of reading out the ketubah to the wedding guests adds incentive to name high figures, which the court defined as unrealistic.

The panel of three rabbinical judges, or dayanaim, reviewing the divorce case in question was divided, with one judge ruling in favor of the ex-wife’s demand. But his colleagues were of the opinion that the ex-husband should not be made to pay the full sum. The rabbinical court, or beth din, finally awarded the woman the equivalent of $31,600 from her ex-husband, or 120,000 shekels.

In the regional beth din’s request to the Chief Rabbinate to set a 1 million shekel cap on ketubah pledges, the rabbinical judges demonstrated that unrealistic undertakings date back centuries. They quoted a senior judge in Morocco, Rabbi Shaul Even Danan, who 200 years ago denounced the custom.

“The unwanted addition to custom of the inflated ketubot, which has spread through our lands reaching the millions, has become a laughable matter,” he wrote. “Paupers without so much as a slice of bread to their name cannot be trusted to pay even a fraction of what they commit to paying – an action which is tantamount to lying outright.”

Separately, on Friday the Tzohar rabbinical organization in Israel announced an intensified campaign to encourage marrying couples to sign, in addition to the ketubah, a prenuptial agreement that is compliant with halachah, or Jewish law, and designed to prevent situations where husbands refuse to grant their wives a Jewish divorce, or “get.”

The campaign, which was announced on Tu b’Av, known as the Jewish Day of Love, which this year falls on Friday, comes amid an escalation in punishments given out by rabbinical courts against intransigent husbands who abuse the fact that under halachah, a man must consent to divorcing his wife for the contract to be nullified as long as he is alive. Women who are refused a get are not eligible to remarry under Jewish law. Any children such women, who are called “agunot,” Hebrew for “chained” or “anchored,” have to another man are in turn also ineligible to marry.

The Tzohar prenup empowers rabbinical judges who recognize it to nullify a marriage based on the man’s signed statement that he automatically consents to give his wife a get. Some 1,000 couples in Israel have signed the Tzohar prenup.

In recent months, Israeli rabbinical courts have published the names of intransigent husbands to publicly shame them and slapped long prison terms on them, including a record five-year term earlier this month. In another precedent, Israel’s highest rabbinical court recently sentenced a man to 30 days in prison for encouraging his son not to divorce the son’s disabled wife.

Recommended from JTA

Advertisement