In his letter to The Jewish Week (“Koch Off Base,” July 29), Richard H. Schwartz comments: “Like most U.S Jews and many Israeli and security experts, Obama recognizes that a just, sustainable, comprehensive two-state solution is essential in order for Israel to avoid another intifada…”
I am sure that Schwartz defines a “two-state solution” as a state for the Jewish people called Israel and a state for the Arab/Palestinian people. The problem is that literally nobody on the other side accepts this definition for a two-state solution. Instead, whether it’s the “moderate” Saudi initiative or the official position of the Palestinian Authority, their bottom line is that Israel must accept a solution based on a “right of return” of Arabs to pre-1967 Israel, which literally means opening up Israel to millions of Arabs. This is not mere posturing; this is their genuinely deeply felt, bottom-line position. This explains why, for example, huge numbers of Palestinians remain in “refugee camps” in Gaza despite the total withdrawal of Jews and the Israel Defense Forces from Gaza.
I think that when Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu insists on Palestinian recognition of Israel as a Jewish state, it’s more than a symbolic demand. Instead, it’s a pragmatic attempt to discern whether or not there’s any congruity between the positions of both sides and whether the “peace process” is merely difficult, or moribund.
Hillcrest, Queens
The New York Jewish Week brings you the stories behind the headlines, keeping you connected to Jewish life in New York. Help sustain the reporting you trust by donating today.
