<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>Articles</title>
    <link>http://jta.org/news/</link>
    <description></description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>rcsillag@jta.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2009</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2009-11-20T16:30:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://expressionengine.com/" />
    

        <item>
      <title>Israeli heart, Jewish soul</title>
      <link>http://jta.org/news/article/2008/04/17/108153/orenessay</link>
      <guid>http://jta.org/site/orenessay/#When:04:00:01Z</guid>
      <description>
      
                  Michael Oren writes that Israel&apos;s most formidable challenge is welding its dual identities as Jewish and Israeli.
              
      </description>
      <dc:subject>Jewish Life, Middle East</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-04-17T04:00:01-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>
    
        <item>
      <title>New historians&#8217; weighing in on war</title>
      <link>http://jta.org/news/article/2007/05/31/101905/orensixdaywar</link>
      <guid>http://jta.org/site/orensixdaywar/#When:04:00:01Z</guid>
      <description>
      
                  Given the archival records, it seems the &apos;new historians&apos; face a formidable task in trying to prove that Israel had hostile intentions in 1967. Though the 40th anniversary of the Six&#45;Day War approaches, the historiographical battle over it has scarcely be
              
      </description>
      <dc:subject>Middle East</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2007-05-31T04:00:01-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>
    
    
    </channel>
</rss>