<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"> 
    
<channel>
    

    <title>Comments by Henry Levine</title>
    <author>Henry Levine</author>
    <link>http://jta.org/user/profile/17744</link>
    <description></description>
    <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>rcsillag@jta.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2009</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2009-11-20T;16:30:00-05:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.pmachine.com/" />


    <item>
      <title>Comment to Op-Ed: Tough questions about Obama needed to be asked</title>
      <link></link>
      <description>Suffice it to say that the campaign that Mr. Brooks remembers is not the one experienced by me or ( I believe) most of the other 78% of American Jewish voters who ultimately voted for President-elect Obama. To cite just two examples:

1.   I recall no attacks on Senator McCain's support for Israel, but numerous false attacks on the President-elect's views.  He was and  is a strong supporter of Israel's security, and there never were and are not now "serious and legitimate reasons to be concerned by [his] positions on Israel, Iran and the Middle East."

2.  Senator Lieberman's fate is undetermined as I write this, but in light of the fact that he not only endorsed Senator McCain but spoke at the Republican convention and [despite promises not to do so] criticized President-elect Obama during the campaign, any decision to replace him as chairman of one of the Senate's most important committees can hardly be viewed as a threat, rebuke, or penalty.  The Democratic Caucus did not leave Senator Lieberman -- he left it.</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[Suffice it to say that the campaign that Mr. Brooks remembers is not the one experienced by me or ( I believe) most of the other 78% of American Jewish voters who ultimately voted for President-elect Obama. To cite just two examples:

1.   I recall no attacks on Senator McCain's support for Israel, but numerous false attacks on the President-elect's views.  He was and  is a strong supporter of Israel's security, and there never were and are not now "serious and legitimate reasons to be concerned by [his] positions on Israel, Iran and the Middle East."

2.  Senator Lieberman's fate is undetermined as I write this, but in light of the fact that he not only endorsed Senator McCain but spoke at the Republican convention and [despite promises not to do so] criticized President-elect Obama during the campaign, any decision to replace him as chairman of one of the Senate's most important committees can hardly be viewed as a threat, rebuke, or penalty.  The Democratic Caucus did not leave Senator Lieberman -- he left it.]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:date>2009-11-20T;16:30:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>


 
 
</channel>
</rss>