<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"> 
    
<channel>
    

    <title>Army destroys Gaza tunnel</title>
    <link>http://jta.org/ENTRY_PERMALINK_HERE/army-destroys-gaza-tunnel/</link>
    <description>The Israeli army destroyed a tunnel from the Gaza Strip that it says was designed to kidnap soldiers.</description>
    <dc:language>en-us</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>rkampeas@jta.org</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2008</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2008-11-05T;08:05:01-05:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.pmachine.com/" />
 


    <item>
      <title>Comment by Maskil</title>
      <link>altneuland@gmail.com</link>
      <description>So if there’s “an immediate and dangerous threat posed by the Hamas terror organization”, remind me again why Israel is observing a cease&#45;fire (fragile or otherwise) with them…

And why does action taken to address this “immediate and dangerous threat” have to be justified with the statement that “there is no intention to disrupt the cease&#45;fire…”?</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if there’s “an immediate and dangerous threat posed by the Hamas terror organization”, remind me again why Israel is observing a cease-fire (fragile or otherwise) with them…
<br />
And why does action taken to address this “immediate and dangerous threat” have to be justified with the statement that “there is no intention to disrupt the cease-fire…”?
</p>]]></content:encoded>
    <dc:date>2009-11-08T;15:36:00-05:00</dc:date>
    </item>

 
</channel>
</rss>