Obama, Sarkozy agree on Iran threat
Barack Obama in Paris said Iran shouldn’t wait for the next U.S. president to accept proposals on ending its enrichment of uranium.
The presumptive Democratic U.S. presidential candidate and French President Nicolas Sarkozy spoke Friday at a joint news conference after meeting during Obama’s European tour, which finished the next day in London.
Obama said he and Sarkozy agreed that Iran poses a grave threat to world security, and he urged Iran to work with Western nations on recent proposals to stop enriching uranium in exchange for economic and political incentives.
“Iran should accept the proposals that President Sarkozy and the E.U. plus 3 are presenting now,” said Obama, a U.S. senator from Illinois. “Don’t wait for the next president because the pressure, I think, is only going to build.”
Iran says its nuclear program is meant for peaceful means, while Israel, the United States, European countries and others say it is meant to build illicit weapons.
Obama also praised the French government’s recent willingness to boost peace efforts in the Middle East, notably through its improved relationship with Syria and Israel, who are indirectly negotiating a peace deal.
Sarkozy did not hide his admiration for Obama, which French and American observers have called “a near endorsement.”
“So good luck to Barack Obama,” said the French leader nearing the end of the news conference. “If he is chosen, then France will be delighted. And if it is somebody else, then France will be the friend of the United States of America.”
Meanwhile, Obama said on Meet the Press aired Sunday morning that making peace between Israel and the Palestinians will weaken Iran.
Bringing peace to the two sides will also “make it easier for Arab states and the Gulf states to support us when it comes to issues like Iraq and Afghanistan,” Obama told host Tom Brokaw on Sunday morning.
Obama also that a Palestinian state is in the best interest of Israelis and Palestinians.
“We’re going to make sure that the Palestinians have the–a state that allows them to prosper as long as we also have certainty that Israel’s security is not being compromised. I think it’s in the interest of both parties, but we are the critical ingredient in terms of making sure that a deal actually gets done.”
This article was made possible by the support of readers like you. Donate to JTA now.
Discussions About this Article Elsewhere
Comments RSS Feed Reader Comments
There are currently no comments to this article. Leave a comment below.
Leave a Comment
To comment on this article, you must first be registered with JTA.
Not Registered?
There are real advantages to a FREE registration with JTA.org:
- Make your voice heard through comments on articles
- Receive our e-mailed Daily Briefing, an invaluable quick-read
- Help decide what Jewish news matters most with interactive tools
Register Now
Already a JTA member?
- Madoff won’t appeal sentence
- IDF salutes Palestinian security forces
- Op-Ed: Israel backers must support a settlement freeze
- Egypt arrests 26 planning Suez attacks
- Op-Ed: Palestinians’ plight, Holocaust are not analogous
- JDL members arrested in Paris
- Satmar mayor praises Obama
- Harvard Hillel victim of $780,000 fraud
- The Chosen: Jewish members in the 111th U.S. Congress
- Jackson kids’ Jewish mother could regain custody
- Biden: Israel can decide for itself on Iran
- Guard shot at Holocaust museum dies
- Canadian politician sues Jewish groups
- In endorsing two states, Netanyahu adopts popular Jewish position
- Some Jewish settlers turning against Israel
- Mass converts pose dilemma for Latin American Jews
Share
Email
Print
Trackback URL: http://jta.org/trackback/109655/
No trackbacks have been created for this article, be the first to create one.