JTA: The Global News Service of the Jewish People

Close

Share

Debaters debate stifling debate

Debaters arguing that the pro-Israel lobby stifles debate won a debate at the Oxford Union. The proposal, “This House believes the pro-Israeli lobby has successfully stifled Western debate about Israel’s actions,” was affirmed in a vote by the two-century-old debating society at Oxford Union in a May 1 debate. Norman Finkelstein, an academic at DePaul University in Chicago who is a strident Israel critic; and Andrew Cockburn, a Marxist theorist who has called for Israel’s dissolution, argued in the affirmative. Martin Indyk, a onetime pro-Israel lobbyist and former U.S. ambassador to Israel who now heads the Saban Institute, a Washington think tank that has criticized some Israeli policies; and British columnist David Aaronovitch argued against.

Discussions About this Article Elsewhere

No trackbacks have been created for this article, be the first to create one.

Comments RSS Feed Reader Comments

There are currently no comments to this article. Leave a comment below.

Leave a Comment

To comment on this article, you must first be registered with JTA.

Not Registered?

There are real advantages to a FREE registration with JTA.org:

  • Make your voice heard through comments on articles
  • Receive our e-mailed Daily Briefing, an invaluable quick-read
  • Help decide what Jewish news matters most with interactive tools

Register Now

Already a JTA member?

I forgot my password

I forgot my password
Get JTA's free Daily Briefing newsletter